The strength of a rivet assembly is predicated on the most highly stressed rivet. The calculation of joint strength in rivet assemblies is very difficult.
The shaving of one rivet THAT WAS NOT DESIGNER TO BE SHAVED! can lead to failure at that point premature to the expected loads in a new structure, it is more likely in an old one where some grip retention had diminished.
Riveted assemblies that are designed with rivets that are designed to be shaved have different rivet spacing, or designed to a different load path or use base sheet gage designed to hold the rivet. This months (April) Advanced Composite Mag has a good analysis of rivet pull through testing.
Also note if the wing is truly laminar flow. oh and before you think otherwise, NO GA wing designed before say 1990 is really laminar flow beyond say 20to 30% chord, it would have beedesigneded with flat rivets or bonded. This is NOT to say all bonded or flat riveted assemblies are laminar flow. In the case of the Tiger wing the bonded structure was for cost consideration. In the case of RV'Becausese flat rivets look cool.
THere is a good reason paintjobs on aircraft cost bucks. Aircraft are hard to paint, do not think it is easy.
------------------------------------
Join BAC today and be a part of the ONLY Type Club for the Musketeer series!
www.beechaeroclub.org
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/musketeermail/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/musketeermail/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:musketeermail-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:musketeermail-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
musketeermail-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-----------------------------------------
This message was automatically imported from BAC-Mail or the Musketeer Mail list. Replies might not be seen by the original author.


Reply With Quote